Resilience should follow opportunity — not replace it.
When Strength Is Praised But the Struggle Was Avoidable
There’s a phrase we use often with children with disabilities:
“She’s so resilient.”
“They’ve come so far.”
“They just push through.”
Resilience is powerful. It’s admirable. It reflects grit and recovery and determination.
But sometimes resilience is not a sign that the system worked.
Sometimes it’s a sign that the system didn’t.
Resilience is powerful but it shouldn’t be created by restriction.
Catching up is effort you don’t always see.
Access should be the starting point—not the reward.
Determination Builds. Resilience Repairs.
There is a difference between determination and resilience — and we often blur the two.
Determination is an internal drive.
It’s choosing effort.
It’s pursuing growth.
Resilience is adaptation after adversity.
It’s recovery after something disrupted progress.
It’s surviving difficulty.
Determination builds growth.
Resilience repairs what should not have been broken.
The question we rarely ask is:
Why was resilience required in the first place?
Support should be built before resilience is needed
When Advocacy Wins — But the Load Still Lands on the Child
In primary school, my mum advocated strongly for one thing: that I go to a mainstream high school.
She believed in my capacity. She believed I deserved access — not a reduced version of education because it was “easier” for the system.
That push wasn’t welcomed.
Expectations were quietly lowered. Decisions were made about what I “could manage” before I’d even been given the chance to prove myself.
But my mum didn’t back down.
She advocated, she pushed, and in the end — she won. I did go to a mainstream high school.
And I’m grateful she fought for that.
Because what came next proved something important: access opens doors. But when access comes after years of low expectations, the cost is often catching up — academically, socially, emotionally — all at once.
In primary school, my mum advocated strongly for one thing: that I go to a mainstream high school.
She believed in my capacity. She believed I deserved access — not a reduced version of education because it was “easier” for the system.
That push wasn’t welcomed.
Expectations were quietly lowered. Decisions were made about what I “could manage” before I’d even been given the chance to prove myself.
But my mum didn’t back down.
She advocated, she pushed, and in the end — she won. I did go to a mainstream high school.
And I’m grateful she fought for that.
Because what came next proved something important: access opens doors. But when access comes after years of low expectations, the cost is often catching up — academically, socially, emotionally — all at once.
Advocacy opened doors. Catching up carried weight.
Effort should expand capacity, not fix restriction.
The Invisible Exhaustion of Catching Up
When early expectations are lowered, the long-term cost often shows up later.
Children with disabilities are sometimes:
- Given simplified content instead of scaffolded access
- Shielded from challenge instead of supported through it
- Measured by behaviour before being measured by capacity
Later, they must work twice as hard to demonstrate what was always there.
And when they succeed, we say:
“Look how resilient they are.”
What we don’t see is the layered exhaustion.
Catching up academically while:
- navigating a brand new school environment
- managing social vulnerability
- juggling curriculum demands
- proving capability repeatedly
That isn’t just determination.
That is cumulative load.
Support should prevent unnecessary adversity — not reward survival after it.
The Subtle Harm of Over-Praising
When we praise resilience too quickly, we risk:
- Normalising avoidable hardship
- Ignoring structural barriers
- Rewarding coping instead of access
- Expecting strength instead of providing scaffolding
Strength should not be the price of opportunity.
Children should not need to recover from lowered expectations.
They should be supported before the gap widens.
Support should come before the struggle.
Success should not require proving your worth
When resilience is required, something failed first.
What Real Support Looks Like
Real support does not remove challenge.
It removes unnecessary barriers.
It means:
- Early access, not delayed permission
- High expectations with scaffolding
- Measuring growth without manufacturing struggle
- Building capacity before resilience is required
Resilience should be supported — not forced.
Determination should be nurtured — not demanded as proof.
Strength is not evidence that the system worked.
Closing Reflection for Parents and Educators
l am determined.
But I shouldn’t have needed that much resilience.
Children with disabilities deserve opportunity that builds them — not adversity that tests them.
When we praise resilience without examining what required it, we risk overlooking the quiet cost.
Sometimes the strength we admire is layered over exhaustion.
If this resonates, you might find The Hidden Load helpful. It explores what often goes unseen — the effort, the catching up, the coping that happens quietly beneath the surface.
All resources mentioned in this series, including The Hidden Load, are now available in the Inclusion Library.
Because resilience should be supported — not required to compensate for restricted access.
Resilience is admirable. Access is essential.
I’m building a world where support comes first
Add comment
Comments